..12.1,30.2:useful calcs and expts*
TULAPURKARA, E.G.; RAMJEE, V.*
Effect of contraction on screen-generated turbulence.*
Aero. J. 84, 290*
1980. `
..30.2:Ames 12 ft and Langley 8ft (no screens - worse) - both poor near M=1*
HARVEY, W.D.; STAINBACK, P.C.; OWEN, F.K.*
Evaluation of flow quality in two large NASA wind tunnels at transonic speeds*
NASA TP 1737 and J. Aircraft 18, 451, 1981*
1980. `
..30.2: apparently, bad advice to put screen ahead of honeycomb*
McKINNEY, M.O.; SHEIMAN, J.*
Evaluation of turbulence reduction devices for the Langley 8-ft transonic pressure tunnel*
NASA TM 81792*
1981. `
..30.2: unoriginal - recommmends screen after honeycomb. Some new data*
SCHEIMAN, J.; BROOKS, J.D.*
Comparison of experimental and theoretical turbulence reduction from screens, honeycomb and honeycomb-screen combinations*
J. Aircraft 18, 638 and NASA TP 1958*
1981. `
..30.2:flow passes through 3 inclined screens*
WINTER, K.G.; EAST, L.F.*
The design of a jet catcher*
RAE TM Aero 1891 (and Aero. J. 87, 26, 1983) *
1981. `
..30.2:model tests for Langley 8 -ft*
SCHEIMAN, J.*
Considerations for the installation of honeycomb and screens to reduce wind tunnel turbulence*
NASA TM 81868*
1981. `
..30.2: optimized perf plate and screen combinations*
TAN-ATICHAT, J.; NAGIB, H.M.; LOEHRKE, R.I.*
Interaction of free stream turbulence with screens and grids - a balance between turbulence scales*
J. Fluid Mech. 114, 501*
1982. `
..24.1,30.2,62.0: DAMTP - RDT related expts. Large eddies little changed*
SENE, K.*
The passage of a mixing layer through a screen*
CNRS Lab. d'Aerothermique, Meudon Rept. 83-2*
1983. `
..59.0,30.2,06.0: screen of height <> delta*
YAJNIK, K.S.; SUNDARAM, S.; ACHARYA, M.*
Observations on large scale motions in highly disturbed boundary layers.*
Structure of Complex Turbulent Shear Flow (R. Dumas and L. Fulachier, Eds.) Springer, p. 366*
1983. `
..24.1,30.2: yet another appearance*
OGUCHI, H.; INOUE, O.*
Mixing layer produced by a screen and its dependence on initial conditions*
J. Fluid Mech. 142, 217*
1984. `
..30.2:plastic screens wiggle less, sag and overshoot more*
MEHTA, R.D.*
Turbulent flow through screens*
AIAA-84-0538*
1984. `
..30.3:Melbourne - extra screens downstream of fan don't help much. See also Hird 1979*
WATKINS, S.*
Calibration of the industrial wind tunnel*
RMIT WTP 1026*
1984. `
..30.2: IC metal vs. plastic work*
MEHTA, R.D.*
Turbulent boundary layer perturbed by a screen*
AIAA J. 23, 1335*
1985. `
..30.2:unsteady flow too*
DURBIN, P.A.; MURAMOTO, K.K.*
Flow through very porous screens*
NASA TP 2436*
1985. `
..30.2: painstaking meas.*
KARNIK, U.; TAVOULARIS, S.*
Generation and manipulation of uniform shear with the use of screens*
Expts. in Fluids 5, 247*
1987. `
..59.0,30.2: random wake flapping with close separation -- analogous to tunnel screen phenomenon*
KIM, H.J.; DURBIN, P.A.*
Investigation of the flow between a pair of circular cylinders in the flopping regime*
J. Fluid Mech. 196, 431*
1988. `
..30.1: use fine final screen (Re_d<40)*
GROTH, J.; JOHANSSON, A.V.*
Turbulence reduction by screens*
J. Fluid Mech. 197, 139*
1988. `
..30.2: Re from 10 ^ -4 to 1*
MUNSON, B.R.*
Very low Reynolds number flow through screens*
J. Fluids Engrg. 110, 462*
1988. `
..24.1,30.2: apparently great sensitivity to irregularities in initial BL or screen - definite doublings of spanwise wavelengths*
BELL, J.H.*
Three-dimensional structure of plane mixing layers*
Stanford Univ. PhD Thesis*
1989. `
..30.2: screens modeled as actuator disks, including refraction*
RAO, K.; STEGER, J.; PLETCHER, R.*
Three-dimensional dual-potential procedure for inlets and indraft wind tunnels*
AIAA J. 27, 876*
1989. `
..30.2,59.0: good review of screen non-uniformity and effect on circular cylinder stagnation*
BOTTCHER, J.; WEDEMEYER, E.*
The flow downstream of screens and its influence on the flow in the stagnation region of cylindrical bodies*
J. Fluid Mech. 204, 501*
1989. `
..12.1,31.1,30.2: on axial cylinder - surface pwa for skin friction measurement. Trouble with screens*
DENGEL, P.; FERNHOLZ, H.H.*
Generation of and measurements in a turbulent boundary layer with zero skin friction*
Advances in Turbulence 2, Springer-Verlag*
1989. `
..59.0,30.2: large-area sudden compression - akin to tunnel screens.  Free surface not an issue*
ADAMS, E.W.; STAMOU, A.I.*
Bistable flow patterns in a free surface water channel*
J. Fluids Engg. 111, 408*
1989. `
..06.0,30.2: pair of gauze screens, one with nonuniform porosity*
WOO, H.G.C.; CERMAK, J.E.*
The production of constant-shear flow*
J. Fluid Mech. 234, 279*
1992. `
..30.2,50.0: a few sample results from nominally fully-developed pipe flow*
GEBHART PARDUE, S.J.; MUNUKUTLA, S.S.*
Experimental studies on turbulence behind screens and perforated plates*
AIAA 92-0556*
1992. `
..30.2,50.0: a few new results, and correlation on solidity and Re*
SALMIRS, S.; ALJABARI, S.*
Prediction of the pressure loss coefficient of wind tunnel turbulence reducing screens*
AIAA 92-0568*
1992. `
..30.3: 0 . 02 percent turbulence. 12 screens, 0 . 62 open area ratio, power factor approx. 0 . 4*
ITO, H.; KOBAYASHI, R.; KOHAMA, Y.*
The low-turbulence wind tunnel at Tohoku University*
Aero J. 96, 141*
1992. `
..30.2: 80 or 100 mesh/in monoplane, 0.66 or 0.56 open area ratio*
O'HERN, T.J.; TORCZYNSKI, J.R.*
Reynolds number dependence of the drag coefficient for laminar flow through fine-scale photoetched screens*
Expts. in Fluids 15, 75*
1993. `
..62.0,30.2: essentially the wind tunnel screen instability problem but at rather higher Re*
VILLERMAUX, E.; HOPFINGER, E.J.*
Periodically arranged co-flowing jets*
J. Fluid Mech. 263, 62*
1994. `
..30.2: data correlation for turbulence produced by screen*
AHMED, G.R.; BRUNDRETT, E.*
Effect of screen porosity and location on wind-tunnel turbulence*
AIAA J. 33, 958*
1995. `
..30.2,49.1: NS plus k, eps. Applied to DLR transonic tunnel*
SELTSAM, M.M.*
Experimental and theoretical study of wide-angle diffuser flow with screens*
AIAA J. 33, 2092*
1995. `
..30.2: tests in pipe downstream of a fan*
FARELL, C.; YOUSSEF, S.*
Experiments on turbulence management using screens and honeycombs*
J. Fluids Engg 118, 26*
1996. `
..30.2,30.3,49.0: national transonic tunnel (dead). Needed screens in wide-angle diffuser before heat exchanger*
YASTE, D.M.; ET AL.*
NWTC back-leg model tests*
AIAA 97-0093*
1997. `
..30.2:  acceptable.  See Euro. J. Mech. B/Fluids 17, 357, 1998*
HANCOCK, P.E.; JOHNSON, A.E.*
Close spacing of settling chamber screens*
Aero. J., Royal Aero. Soc. 101, 179*
1997. `
..30.2,24.4:  Ames FML boundary-layer tunnel.  Doesn't specifically mention amplification of longitudinal vorticity*
WATMUFF, J.H.*
Detrimental effects of almost immeasurably small freestream nonuniformities generated by wind-tunnel screens*
AIAA J. 36, 379*
1998. `
..30.2:  extension of Taylor-Batchelor analysis - arbitrary spacing*
HANCOCK, P.E.*
Plane multiple screens in non-uniform flow, with particular application to wind tunnel settling chamber screens*
Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 17, 357*
1998. `